MENU

Criminal Justice

Obama's Enforcer: Eric Holder's Justice Department - Event Audio/Video

Las Vegas Lawyers Chapter
John Fund, Hans A. von Spakovsky August 28, 2014

From “Fast and Furious” to the unprecedented surveillance of journalists, Eric Holder’s Justice Department has become the dark side of the Obama Administration. The Attorney General is at the center of a growing list of scandals and congressional investigations. Obama’s Enforcer uncovers how the DOJ has become a hotbed of left-wing legal activism. It delves into the close personal association of Holder and Obama, describes the politicization of the Department of Justice, and provides in-depth portraits of the radical lawyers in Holder’s inner circle. The book has been endorsed by Sen. Ted Cruz and Radio Talk Show host Mark Levin. The Las Vegas Lawyers Chapter hosted this event on August 11, 2014.

Featuring:

  • John Fund, Columnist, National Review Online, and Senior Editor, The American Spectator
  • Hans A. von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow, The Heritage Foundation

Supreme Court Criminal Law Round Up - October Term 2013 - Podcast

Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Podcast
Dean Mazzone, Kent S. Scheidegger July 22, 2014

The Supreme Court issued a number of notable opinions in the area of criminal law during the recently concluded term. Members of the Federalist Society’s Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Executive Committee offered their analysis on recent developments in the Supreme Court’s criminal law jurisprudence and fielded questions from a call-in audience.

  • Dean Mazzone, Chief of the Enterprise and Major Crimes Division, Massachusetts Attorney General's Office
  • Kent S. Scheidegger, Legal Director and General Counsel, Criminal Justice Legal Foundation

Drunk Driving and the Fourth Amendment: The Implications of Missouri v. McNeely - Podcast

Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Podcast
Orin S. Kerr, Rory Little, David Stras May 28, 2014

The Supreme Court’s decision last Term in Missouri v. McNeely is an important one for judges and attorneys involved in criminal matters in state courts. In McNeely, the Court decided that the exigency exception to the warrant requirement does not always apply to the taking of blood from the driver to determine his or her blood-alcohol level, even though alcohol dissipates in the blood over time. In this Teleforum, we examined the implications of the McNeely decision, including whether any of the other exceptions to the warrant requirement apply, its implications for state-court judges and practitioners, and how McNeely fits within the framework of other recent Fourth Amendment decisions of the Supreme Court.

Featuring:

  • Prof. Orin S. Kerr, Fred C. Stevenson Research Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law School
  • Prof. Rory Little, Professor of Law, University of California Hastings College of the Law
  • Moderator: Hon. David Stras, Minnesota Supreme Court