2015 Separation of Powers CLE Course

Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group August 20, 12:00 AMThe Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch
0130 Daybreak Ridge
Avon, CO 81620

2013 Separation of Powers CLE CourseU.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia and Professor John Baker of Georgetown Law will teach a ten-hour CLE course on the courts, standing, the non-delegation doctrine, and appointments and removal, as they relate to the separation of powers. This course is offered exclusively to Federalist Society members. [Register now!]

A Debate on An Article V Convention of the States

Hampton Roads Lawyers Chapter April 10, 12:00 PMRegent University School of Law
Robertson Hall, Room 103
1000 Regent University Drive
Virginia Beach, VA 23464


  • Bob Marshall - Virginia Delegate, Republican, Representative for the 13th District in the Virginia General Assembly
  • Michael Farris, Esq. - Chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association, Chancellor of Patrick Henry College

Moderator: Dr. Jim Davids - Associate Professor and Director of LL.M. and M.A. Programs, Regent University School of Law

Oneok v. Learjet - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast 3-12-15 featuring Daniel Lyons
Daniel Lyons March 12, 2015

On January 12, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Oneok, Inc. v. Learjet. The question in this case is whether the Natural Gas Act, which gives the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission jurisdiction to regulate natural gas sales in interstate commerce for resale (wholesale sales), preempts state-law antitrust claims which challenge industry practices that directly affect the wholesale natural gas market when those claims are asserted by litigants who purchased gas in retail transactions.

To discuss the case, we have Daniel Lyons, who is an Associate Professor of Law at the Boston College Law School.

North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast 3-9-15 featuring Sasha Volokh
Alexander Volokh March 09, 2015

On February 25, 2015 the Supreme Court heard oral argument in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission.  The question in this case is whether the state-action exemption from federal antitrust laws applies to a state dental regulatory board when the majority of board members are dental professionals who are elected by other market participants--and thus potential competitors of anyone seeking entry into the dental industry.  The Federal Trade Commission denied immunity to the Board and the Fourth Circuit affirmed that ruling on appeal

By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Fourth Circuit.  Because a controlling number of the Board’s decisionmakers are active market participants in the occupation the Board regulates, the Court explained, the Board can invoke state-action antitrust immunity only if it was subject to active supervision by the State--and that supervision is lacking here.

Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court, which was joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, which Justices Scalia and Thomas joined.

To discuss the case, we have Prof. Alexander “Sasha” Volokh, who is an Associate Professor of Law at the Emory University School of Law.  Professor Volokh received his JD and PhD in economics from Harvard University.