Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast Nelson Lund April 14, 2016
In a per curiam opinion issued on March 21, 2016, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded a decision by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts upholding a state law prohibiting the possession of stun guns, finding that the decision was inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago. Justices Alito and Thomas issued a concurring opinion which would have gone further in finding the Massachusetts statute unconstitutional. Our expert discussed the case and its implications for the Court’s Second Amendment jurisprudence going forward.
Civil Rights and Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Podcast
- Prof. Nelson Lund, University Professor, George Mason University School of Law
In July, the Illinois State Rifle Association filed an emergency motion for an injunction to bar the state from enforcing the ban on carrying firearms in public. On Thursday, October 3, 2013, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments over the injunction request. David Thompson, who argued the case before a three-judge panel including Judge Richard Posner, joined us on a Teleforum conference call to speak about ongoing litigation on gun rights in the 7th circuit.
- Mr. David H. Thompson, Managing Partner, Cooper & Kirk PLLC
- Moderator: Mr. Dean A. Reuter, Vice President and Director of Practice Groups, The Federalist Society
[Listen now!] Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Podcast
On September 12, 2013, the Illinois State Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in People v. Aguilar striking down a section of the state's Aggravated Unlawful Use of Weapons statue as unconstitutional, saying that it violates the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The court drew upon the U.S. Supreme Court opinions in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, as well as the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ 2012 ruling in Moore v. Madigan. Our expert will provide analysis and discussion of the opinion.
- Prof. Nelson Lund, Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law
- Moderator: Dean Reuter, Vice President and Director of Practice Groups, The Federalist Society
Mandatory Liability Insurance for Firearm Owners: Design Choices and Second Amendment Limits Engage Volume 14, Issue 1 February 2013
Some twenty-five years ago, one of us sketched out a rationale for using mandatory liability insurance rules as an alternative to common forms of direct government regulation of firearms. Until recently, this possibility attracted almost no attention, but it is now being considered as a response to the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. The time thus seems right to explore the subject in somewhat more depth, with an eye especially to design features that would be needed to minimize interference with the constitutional right to keep and bear arms....[Read More!] Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Podcast
President Obama has proposed, and Congress is currently debating, various gun control measures in reaction to the tragic events in Newtown. Is the President's emphasis on gun control misplaced or is gun control the most appropriate response to this situation? Would the measures being debated be effective? Are there any constitutional impediments to those proposals? In this previously recorded conference call, our speakers debate these and other issues related to the aftermath of Newtown.
- Mr. Jonathan E. Lowy, Director, Legal Action Project, Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
- Mr. John G. Malcolm, Senior Legal Fellow, Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, The Heritage Foundation
- Moderator: Mr. Dean A. Reuter, Vice President & Director of Practice Groups, The Federalist Society