Short video explaining Heffernan v. City of Paterson Adèle Keim January 15, 2016
Adèle Auxier Keim, counsel for the Becket Fund, explains the First Amendment issues in the upcoming Supreme Court case, Heffernan v. City of Paterson. Officer Heffernan was demoted by his employer after he was seen picking up a campaign sign in support of a rival politician, and claims that he was retaliated against in violation of the Constitution. The City of Paterson argues that since Officer Heffernan was picking up the campaign sign for someone else, that there was no violation of the First Amendment. This video explains the Constitutional Right of Freedom of Assembly and its role as gatekeeper for other Constitutional rights.
Ms. Keim co-authored an amicus brief for the Becket Fund in support of Officer Heffernan. 2015 National Lawyers Convention
What was the founders' conception of the role of Congress? Was that conception clearly understood? To what degree was that conception followed during our nation's early years and to what degree did early Congresses follow the Constitution? To what degree were members of Congress representing their districts and to what degree were they representing national interests? In what ways did the Senate and the House originally operate differently? Originally, the prevailing view was that “the laws that free men live under are the laws that have been hauled up." In other words, we are ruled by the laws that we and our neighbors made. Was this ever true?
Showcase Panel I: The Original View of Congress
9:30 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.
- Prof. Akhil R. Amar, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale University
- Dr. Louis Fisher, Scholar in Residence, the Constitution Project
- Prof. Tara J. Helfman, Associate Professor of Law, Syracuse University College of Law
- Dr. Gordon Lloyd, Robert and Katheryn Dockson Professor of Public Policy, Pepperdine University School of Public Policy
- Moderator: Hon. James L. Buckley, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit (ret.) and former U.S. Senator
The Mayflower Hotel Intellectual Property Practice Group Podcast
Protection of intellectual property (IP) rights is indispensable to maintaining a vibrant economy, especially in the digital age as creativity and innovation increasingly take intangible forms. Long before the digital age, however, the U.S. Constitution secured the IP rights of authors and inventors to the fruits of their labors. The essays in The Constitutional Foundations of Intellectual Property: A Natural Rights Perspective explore the foundational underpinnings of intellectual property that informed the Constitution of 1787, and it explains how these concepts informed the further development of IP rights from the First Congress through Reconstruction. The essays address the contributions of important figures such as John Locke, George Washington, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Noah Webster, Joseph Story, Daniel Webster, and Abraham Lincoln to the development of IP rights within the context of American constitutionalism. Claims that copyrights and patents are not property at all are in fashion in some quarters. This book’s essays challenge those dubious claims. Unlike other works that offer a strictly pragmatic or utilitarian defense of IP rights, this book seeks to recover the Constitution’s understanding of IP rights as ultimately grounded in the natural rights of authors and inventors.
Short Video about the Constitution
- Seth L. Cooper, Senior Fellow, The Free State Foundation
- Randolph J. May, President, The Free State Foundation
- Prof. Mark F. Schultz, Senior Scholar & Co-Director of Academic Programs, Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property, George Mason University School of Law and Associate Professor, Southern Illinois University School of Law
Michael S. Paulsen
, Luke Paulsen September 18, 2015
Constitutional scholar Michael Stokes Paulsen and his son, Luke Paulsen, discuss the project of their joint co-authorship of The Constitution: An Introduction, written over the course of 9 years and published in 2015. The book presents a general readers' account of the Constitution, from its origins to its basic provisions to its interpretation. Buy the book: http://amzn.to/1FiMVth. Free Speech & Election Law Practice Group Podcast
When the United States government passed the Bill of Rights in 1791, its uncompromising protection of speech and of the press were unlike anything the world had ever seen before. But by 1798, the once-dazzling young republic of the United States was on the verge of collapse: Partisanship gripped the weak federal government, British seizures threatened American goods and men on the high seas, and war with France seemed imminent as its own democratic revolution deteriorated into terror. Suddenly, the First Amendment, which protected harsh commentary of the weak government, no longer seemed as practical. So that July, President John Adams and the Federalists in control of Congress passed an extreme piece of legislation that made criticism of the government and its leaders a crime punishable by heavy fines and jail time. Liberty’s First Crisis tells the story of the 1798 Sedition Act, the crucial moment when high ideals met real-world politics and the country’s future hung in the balance. Author Charles Slack discussed his latest book and answered questions from the audience.