MENU

Judiciary

2015 Separation of Powers CLE Course

Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Thursday, August 20, 12:00 AMThe Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch
0130 Daybreak Ridge
Avon, CO 81620

U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia and Professor John Baker of Georgetown Law will teach a ten-hour CLE course on the courts, standing, the non-delegation doctrine, and appointments and removal, as they relate to the separation of powers. This course is offered exclusively to Federalist Society members. [Register now!]

Overruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. Supreme Court - Event Video

Co-sponsored by the Charles Koch Institute and Reason
Damon Root, Neomi Rao November 19, 2014

Damon Root discusses his new book, Overruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. Supreme Court, in which the Reason senior editor asks the question: can the federal government make you eat your fruits and vegetables? 

Does the Constitution empower the Supreme Court to actively protect individual rights from the whimsy and overreach of lawmakers? The debate over judicial restraint vs. judicial activism is at the heart of Overruled, which makes a bold case for libertarian judicial activism—the notion that the courts should swat away unwarranted and indefensible incursions on our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

The Federalist Society, the Charles Koch Institute, and Reason co-sponsored this event on November 18, 2014.

Featuring:

  • Mr. Damon Root, Author of Overruled and senior editor of Reason magazine and Reason.com
  • Prof. Neomi Rao, Associate Professor, George Mason University School of Law

The Mayflower Hotel
Washington, DC

Without Standing, Are We All Sitting Ducks? - Event Video

2014 National Lawyers Convention
Jonathan H. Adler, Amanda Cohen Leiter, Robert N. Weiner, Patrick Wyrick, A. Raymond Randolph, Eileen O'Connor November 17, 2014

For a federal court to consider an issue, there must be a case or controversy, and the parties before the court must have standing, i.e., a stake in the outcome of the decision.  While standing is important in our system of justice, the courts are not the only avenue for relief (the ballot box, theoretically, being another).  This panel will explore the history, development and current status of standing doctrine in regulatory litigation, with particular focus on the extent to which standing and related justiciability requirements have come to serve as a shield against meaningful judicial review of agency actions.

The Federalist Society's Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group presented this panel on "Without Standing, Are We All Sitting Ducks?" on Saturday, November 15, during the 2014 National Lawyers Convention.

Featuring:

  • Prof. Jonathan H. Adler, Johan Verheij Memorial Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University School of Law
  • Prof. Amanda Cohen Leiter, Associate Professor of Law, American University Washington College of Law   
  • Mr. Robert N. Weiner, Partner, Arnold & Porter LLP
  • Mr. Patrick Wyrick, Solicitor General, State of Oklahoma
  • Moderator: Hon. A Raymond Randolph, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
  • Introduction: Hon. Eileen O'Connor, Partner, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP; and Chairman, Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group

Mayflower Hotel
Washington, DC

Address by Orrin Hatch - Event Video

2014 National Lawyers Convention
Orrin Hatch, Leonard A. Leo November 17, 2014

Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah delivered this address at the 2014 National Lawyers Convention on Friday, November 14, 2014. He was introduced by Mr. Leonard A. Leo, Executive Vice President of The Federalist Society.

Featuring:

  • Hon. Orrin Hatch, U.S. Senate
  • Introduction: Mr. Leonard A. Leo, Executive Vice President, The Federalist Society

Mayflower Hotel
Washington, DC

Diversity Jurisdiction from Strawbridge to CAFA - Event Video

2014 National Lawyers Convention
Charles J. Cooper, Edith H. Jones, J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Dean A. Reuter November 17, 2014

In a recent article, constitutional lawyer Charles Cooper argued that federal courts have erred by too narrowly construing their statutory grants of diversity jurisdiction. Mr. Cooper urges the courts to recognize much broader federal jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship as a matter of both statutory and constitutional interpretation.  Others have called on Congress to consider legislation that would expand federal courts' diversity jurisdiction to include all cases in which any two parties come from different states.  Our panel will include members of the federal judiciary to discuss whether (and if so, how) federal court jurisdiction should be expanded.

The Federalist Society's Practice Groups presented this panel on "Diversity Jurisdiction from Strawbridge to CAFA" on Friday, November 14, during the 2014 National Lawyers Convention.

Featuring:

  • Hon. Charles J. Cooper, Partner, Cooper & Kirk, PLLC, and former Assistant U.S. Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel
  • Hon. Edith H. Jones, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
  • Hon.  J. Harvie Wilkinson III, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
  • Introduction: Mr. Dean A. Reuter, Vice President & Director of Practice Groups, The Federalist Society

Mayflower Hotel
Washington, DC