MENU

EVENTS

UPCOMING EVENTS

or or
or to  

Cooperation or Coercion on Climate: Is the EPA Trying to Deputize the States?

Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Teleforum July 28, 02:00 PMFederalist Society Teleforum Conference Call

It has been argued that EPA's recently announced carbon emissions rule is just the latest attempt to draw states into the implementation of its regulations. The Supreme Court has long been permissive of such "cooperative federalism" programs in both the regulatory and spending contexts, insisting in New York v. United States (1992) and Printz v. United States (1997) that such programs constitute mere "encouragement" not rising to the level of coercion or commandeering. But Texas's fight to resist being drawn into implementing EPA's greenhouse gas regulations suggests that federal "encouragement" can be deeply coercive, employing penalties against the state's economy that courts have no doctrine to account for.

  • Prof. Michael S. Greve, George Mason University School of Law
  • Mario Loyola, Senior Fellow, Texas Public Policy Foundation
  • Dr. Bryan W. Shaw, Chairman, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Net Neutrality: The Power to Act

Telecommunications & Electronic Media Practice Group Teleforum July 29, 02:00 PMFederalist Society Teleforum Conference Call

After suffering two judicial setbacks already, most recently in the D.C. Circuit’s Verizon v. FCC decision this past January, the Federal Communications Commission is once again proposing to adopt new net neutrality regulations. The proposed regulations would bar internet service providers from blocking access to any lawful website or from engaging in commercially unreasonable practices. A key aspect of the FCC’s proposal drawing considerable attention concerns whether the FCC should bar so-called paid prioritization of internet traffic.

In this Teleforum, two experts with divergent views will address whether there is any need for the FCC to adopt any new neutrality regulations and, if so, whether the agency possesses the legal authority to do so. There are two principal legal theories that may support FCC action that we will discuss – using the FCC’s existing authority under Section 706 of the Communications Act or classifying internet service providers as common carriers under Title II of the Act. The panelists will also discuss the most important question of all: whether and how net neutrality regulation might affect consumer welfare.

  • Maureen K. Ohlhausen, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission
  • Prof. Daniel Lyons, Boston College Law School
  • Michael Weinberg, Vice President, Public Knowledge
  • Moderator: Randolph J. May, President, The Free State Foundation

The Highs–and Lows–of High-Frequency Trading

Corporations, Securities & Antitrust Practice Group Teleforum July 30, 02:00 PMFederalist Society Teleforum Conference Call

While other fields of law are trying to anticipate the future ramifications of the widespread use of drones, robots, and self-driving vehicles, financial markets have already confronted the fact that – for about five years now – automated trading programs have made the majority of all trades in equities and commodities. Automation has substantially reduced the cost of trading, but it has also had profound effects on the structure of financial markets, and has raised questions about its facilitation of allegedly abusive practices. A 2013 documentary, “Ghost Exchange,” and a 2014 best-selling book, Michael Lewis’s Flash Boys, focused public attention on the effects of high-frequency trading (HFT) on market integrity and stability, and helped precipitate a series of aggressive enforcement investigations as well as rulemaking initiatives at financial regulatory agencies in the U.S. and abroad. Our experts will review the state of the debate over HFT, and possible paths forward.

  • Brian Mannix, President, Buckland Mill Associates
  • Joanne Medero, Managing Director, BlackRock Inc.

NYC Bar Exam Happy Hour

New York City Young Lawyers Chapter July 30, 05:15 PMClyde Frazier's Wine & Dine
485 10th Ave.
New York City, NY 10018

Celebrate the conclusion of the NY Bar Exam with food and drink courtesy of the Federalist Society NYC Young Lawyers Chapter. The happy hour will begin immediately after the MBE, and is located one block from the Javits Center exam location.  

Milton Friedman Legacy Day Luncheon

The Connecticut Lawyers Chapter July 31, 11:30 AMPond House Cafe at Elizabeth Park
1555 Asylum Avenue
West Hartford, CT 06117

Speaker:

  • Stephen Moore, Chief Economist, The Heritage Foundation

Chicago Summer Social

The Chicago Lawyers Chapter July 31, 05:30 PMChicago Yacht Club
400 E. Monroe
Chicago, IL

Please join the Chicago Lawyers Chapter for a summer social to meet and mingle with law students and lawyer Federalist Society members.

2014 Iowa Supreme Court Term Review

Iowa Lawyers Chapter August 04, 05:00 PMIowa State Bar Association
625 East Court Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50309

Speakers:

  • Michael J. Carroll, Shareholder, Coppola, McConville, Coppola, Carroll, Hockenberg, & Scalise, P.C.

  • Gary Dickey, Jr., Managing Member, Dickey  & Campbell Law Firm P.L.C. 

  • Ryan G. Koopmans, Member, Nyemaster Goode P.C.

  • Alan Ostergren, Muscatine County Attorney

  • Samuel P. Langholz (Moderator), State Public Defender

 

These Events are Near You