The Federalist Society

Past Events


Identification Please: State Voter ID Laws and the Voting Rights Act

The Austin Lawyers Chapter

May 9, 2013

Speaker:

  • H. Christopher Bartolomucci, Partner, Bancroft PLLC



Cybersecurity -- Information Sharing, Privacy, Regulation, and Reason

International & National Security Law Practice Group Teleforum

May 8, 2013

Cyber threats were the first identified Global Threat in the US Intelligence Community Worldwide Threat Assessment issued in March 2013.  Many Cybersecurity proposals feature information sharing and enhanced regulation of critical infrastructure industries as the best measures to prevent and mitigate cyber attacks.  Can information sharing improve security while protecting privacy?  Can regulatory measures help, without imposing excessive burdens on business?

Featuring:

  • Mr. Gus P. Coldebella, Partner, Goodwin Procter LLP and former Acting General Counsel, Department of Homeland Security
  • Ms. Michelle Richardson, Legislative Counsel, American Civil Liberties Union
  • Prof. Nathan A. Sales, George Mason University School of Law and former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy Development, Department of Homeland Security

Comments and Questions by:

  • Mr. John Reed, Staff Writer, National Security, Foreign Policy Magazine



Understanding Clarence Thomas: The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Restoration

Stanford Student Chapter

May 7, 2013

Speaker:

  • Dr. Ralph Rossum, Claremont McKenna College
  • Professor William Baude, Stanford Law



New "Persuader" Rule: A Threat to Lawyers and Clients?

Labor & Employment Law Practice Group Teleforum

May 6, 2013

A little-known labor law, enacted more than half a century ago, may soon be reinterpreted by the Obama Administration in an attempt to bolster union organizing.  The statute requires consultants known as “persuaders” to disclose to the government their clients, services provided, and legal fees.  For more than 50 years, lawyers who advised clients about employee communications, but did not communicate directly with employees, were not persuaders.  But now, under a new interpretation of “advice,” lawyers will be persuaders if they “draft, revise or provide” employee communications with a persuasive objective.  And the scope of required disclosure will be vastly expanded to encompass all “protected concerted activity.”  A law firm will be required to make full disclosure to the federal government on every one of its labor and employment law clients, even if they do not receive persuader services.  If a firm fails to comply, its top officers will face severe criminal penalties — a year in jail and a $10,000 fine.

Featuring:

  • Mr. Harold P. (Hal) Coxson, Shareholder, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart PC
  • Mr. Michael J. Lotito, Co-Chairman, Workplace Policy Institute and Shareholder, Littler Mendelson PC
  • Moderator: Mr. William J. Emanuel, Shareholder, Littler Mendelson P.C.



Who Caused the Financial Crisis?

The Long Island Lawyers Chapter

May 6, 2013

Speaker:

  • Robert T. Miller, Professor of Law and F. Arnold Daum Fellow in Corporate Law at the University of Iowa College of Law



The Annual Lawyer / Student Mixer

The Phoenix Lawyers Chapter

May 3, 2013

Speaker:

  • Judge Andrew Hurwitz, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit



Dinner with SEC Commissioner Dan Gallagher

The DC Young Lawyers Chapter

May 2, 2013

SOLD OUT

Speaker:

  • Dan M. Gallagher, Commissioner, Securities and Exchange Commission



Luncheon with Justice Jeffrey Boyd

The Dallas Lawyers Chapter

May 2, 2013

Speaker:

  • Justice Jeffrey Boyd, Texas Supreme Court



The Boston Terrorist Attack and Strategic Intelligence

International & National Security Law Practice Group

May 2, 2013

Because the surviving Boston bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, is a U.S. citizen, trial before a military commission is not available under the Military Commissions Act.  Indefinite detention as an enemy combatant was an option, but that appears to have been taken off the table by the Obama Administration.  So the question is the extent and value of Miranda-free interrogation.  Was Mr. Tsarnaev read his Miranda rights prematurely?  And what should or could the FBI and rest of intelligence community have done in advance of the attack, if anything, to monitor or surveil the deceased suspect, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, in view of the request from Russia and the the elder Tsarnaev brother’s 2012 return trip?

Featuring:

  • Mr. Andrew C. McCarthy, Executive Director, Philadelphia Freedom Center and Contributing Editor, National Review



Supreme Court Cases Involving Oklahoma

The Tulsa Lawyers Chapter

May 1, 2013

Speakers:

  • Chad Smith, Former Principal Chief of the Cherokees
  • Kevin Patrick, Shareholder; Patrick, Miller, Kropf & Noto




Total Records: 5315


Previous ] Next ]


The Federalist Society