MENU

Downsides of Civil Juries - Podcast

Litigation Practice Group Podcast
Featuring Renée Lettow Lerner, Suja Thomas
September 25, 2015

As with many things in life and in the law, there are pros and cons. This program will focus on that premise with civil juries. Proponents argue that the civil jury system, with jurors drawn from the general public, represents the values and judgment of the public in individual cases, and that deliberations among those same jurors generally lead to just results. Critics argue that complex cases should be decided by judges or special masters rather than lay jurors who cannot properly comprehend the complexities of some cases, that jurors are more susceptible to what should be unconvincing arguments by particularly persuasive attorneys, or that juries otherwise reach conclusions sometimes not supported by law. There is also concern that verdicts by juries do not permit thorough appeal on the merits. The civil jury has been virtually abolished in every other common law country. Should the system be reexamined? Is it in need of updating? Our experts answered these and other questions.

Featuring:

  • Prof. Renée Lerner, Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law School
  • Prof. Suja Thomas, Professor, University of Illinois College of Law