MENU

Administrative Law & Regulation

Subscribe in a reader

Subcommittees

  • Constitutional Structure
  • Energy
  • FDA
  • Federal Regulatory Reform
  • Judicial Review
  • State Regulatory Reform
  • Tax

The Role of Economic Liberty in the United States

Administrative Law & Regulation and Telecommunications & Electronic Media Practice Groups
R. Ted Cruz, Maureen K. Ohlhausen, Michelle P. Connolly, Clark Neily, Lawrence J. Spiwak March 28, 2017

The Federalist Society will host a lunch and discussion on the role of Economic Liberty in the United States on Tuesday, March 28, 2017.  Today, many job-seeking Americans and companies face significant government barriers that restrict their full participation in the economy.  These barriers, often in the form of restrictive regulatory regimes, prevent consumers from using their skills, entering new professions, and starting new businesses.  They also prevent low and middle class Americans from moving up the ladder.  Competition and free-markets have the power to spur innovation, create new business models, and drive economic opportunity and growth.  Policymakers, like Acting Chair of the Federal Trade Commission Maureen Ohlhausen, have begun to take actions to address these barriers.  For example, Ms. Ohlhausen recently announced the creation of an Economic Liberty Task Force to advance economic liberty issues, with a particular focus on occupational licensing regulations.  These topics and others will be addressed.

Confirmed Speakers Include: 

  • Hon. R. Ted Cruz, United States Senator, Texas
  • Hon. Maureen K. Ohlhausen, Acting Chairman, Federal Trade Commission
  • Prof. Michelle P. Connolly, Professor of the Practice of Economics, Duke University
  • Clark Neily, Senior Attorney, Institute for Justice
  • Lawrence J. Spiwak, President, Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal and Economic Public Policy Studies

The Role of White House Counsel - Podcast

Administrative Law and Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Groups Podcast
Timothy E. Flanigan, C. Boyden Gray March 17, 2017

In recent weeks, there has been a flurry of editorials on the proper role of the White House Counsel, driven by criticism of White House Counsel Donald McGahn. After the rollout of President Trump’s Immigration Executive Order, some, like Jack Goldsmith, have written that McGahn should have worked with other agencies before the Order was released to prevent the chaos that ensued.

But what is the proper role of the White House Counsel? Is it to coordinate inter-agency reaction? Should he or she provide legal support to the President first? Or is his or her real client the office of the presidency? Former White House Counsel C. Boyden Gray and former Deputy White House Counsel Timothy Flanigan joined us to help answer these questions and many others.

Featuring:

  • Hon. Timothy E. Flanigan, Chief Legal & Compliance Officer, Corporate Secretary, Cancer Treatment Centers of America; Former Deputy White House Counsel to President George W. Bush
  • Hon. C. Boyden Gray, Founding Partner, Boyden Gray & Associates; Former White House Counsel to President George H.W. Bush

The Congressional Review Act’s “Rediscovery” and Hidden Uses - Podcast

Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group Podcast
David M. McIntosh, Todd F. Gaziano February 27, 2017

In 1996, Congress passed the Congressional Review Act (CRA). Before an executive agency rule—broadly defined to include agency guidance documents—can take effect, the CRA requires the agency to submit it to Congress and the Government Accountability Office. The CRA provides fast-track procedures for Congress to overrule any rule with a joint resolution of disapproval if the President signs it into law (or Congress overrides any veto). The expedited procedures may be used during the first 60 session days after the rule is submitted and during the first 60 session days of the next session if the rule was submitted near the end of the previous session. The only successful invalidation of a regulation prior to this year was in 2001, when the Department of Labor ergonomics rule issued at the end of the Clinton Administration was voided.

In the last few months, there has been renewed attention to the CRA, with Congress’ action to overrule many more rules. And some have asserted that the law may have much broader implications for rules passed over the past 8 years and not previously sent to Congress as the CRA requires.   

Former Congressman David McIntosh, who sponsored the CRA, and former congressional counsel to Mr. McIntosh, Todd Gaziano, will join us to discuss the ins and outs of the CRA and its potential applications in the coming months. This Teleforum is the second installment in our Legal Options for the New Administration series. 

Featuring:

  • Hon. David M. McIntosh, President of the Club for Growth and Vice Chairman of The Federalist Society 
  • Todd F. Gaziano, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Law and Executive Director of Pacific Legal Foundation’s DC Center

The Congressional Review Act’s “Rediscovery” and Hidden Uses

Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group Teleforum
David M. McIntosh, Todd F. Gaziano February 24, 2017

In 1996, Congress passed the Congressional Review Act (CRA). Before an executive agency rule—broadly defined to include agency guidance documents—can take effect, the CRA requires the agency to submit it to Congress and the Government Accountability Office. The CRA provides fast-track procedures for Congress to overrule any rule with a joint resolution of disapproval if the President signs it into law (or Congress overrides any veto). The expedited procedures may be used during the first 60 session days after the rule is submitted and during the first 60 session days of the next session if the rule was submitted near the end of the previous session. The only successful invalidation of a regulation prior to this year was in 2001, when the Department of Labor ergonomics rule issued at the end of the Clinton Administration was voided.

In the last few months, there has been renewed attention to the CRA, with Congress’ action to overrule many more rules. And some have asserted that the law may have much broader implications for rules passed over the past 8 years and not previously sent to Congress as the CRA requires.   

Former Congressman David McIntosh, who sponsored the CRA, and former congressional counsel to Mr. McIntosh, Todd Gaziano, will join us to discuss the ins and outs of the CRA and its potential applications in the coming months. This Teleforum is the second installment in our Legal Options for the New Administration series. 

Featuring:

  • Hon. David M. McIntosh, President of the Club for Growth and Vice Chairman of The Federalist Society 
  • Todd F. Gaziano, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Law and Executive Director of Pacific Legal Foundation’s DC Center

President Trump's "One-In-Two-Out" Executive Order - Podcast

Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group Podcast
Susan E. Dudley, Jitinder Kohli February 10, 2017

President Trump took a step toward fulfilling his campaign promise to cut regulations last week when he signed an executive order calling for two regulations to be eliminated for every new one issued. The president has indicated that the order will yield “the largest ever cut by far in terms of regulations.” But some are worried that it is a Sophie’s choice for regulatory agencies, and the order will change how regulators do business in the U.S.

Professor Susan Dudley, director of the George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center explained what the order does and does not do. Jitinder Kohli, former head of the UK Better Regulation Executive, described lessons learned from the UK’s “one-in-three-out” policy. This Teleforum was the first episode in the Executive Order Teleforum Series

Featuring:

  • Professor Susan Dudley, Director, George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center
  • Jitinder Kohli, Director in Public Sector Practice, Deloitte Consulting

 

President Trump's "One-In-Two-Out" Executive Order

Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group Teleforum
Susan E. Dudley, Jitinder Kohli February 09, 2017

President Trump took a step toward fulfilling his campaign promise to cut regulations last week when he signed an executive order calling for two regulations to be eliminated for every new one issued. The president has indicated that the order will yield “the largest ever cut by far in terms of regulations.” But some are worried that it is a Sophie’s choice for regulatory agencies, and the order will change how regulators do business in the U.S.

Professor Susan Dudley, director of the George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center will talk about what the order does and does not do.  Jitinder Kohli, former head of the UK Better Regulation Executive, will talk about lessons learned from the UK’s “one-in-three-out” policy. This Teleforum is the first episode in the Executive Order Teleforum Series.

Featuring:

  • Professor Susan Dudley, Director, George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center
  • Jitinder Kohli, Director in Public Sector Practice, Deloitte Consulting

Labor Issues in the Sharing Economy

Short video on the Sharing Economy
February 09, 2017

The sharing economy is changing the nature of work, yet it doesn’t fit clearly within laws governing labor and employment. In this short documentary, policy experts, lawyers, and sharing economy workers weigh in on the debate over "contractors v. employees" and what kind of protections workers need in this new economy.