Burrage v. United States and Rosemond v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 11-19-13 featuring John Malcolm
November 19, 2013John G. Malcolm
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
Burrage v. United States and Rosemond v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:014:52
On November 12, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument for several cases, including Burrage v. United States and Rosemond v. United States. The question in Burrage v. United States is twofold. First, the case considers whether the federal crime of distribution of illegal drugs causing death is a strict liability crime, without any requirement that the death be foreseeable or that the drugs be its “proximate” cause. The second question is whether a person can be convicted of this crime under jury instructions that direct conviction when the illegal drug “contributed to” death by “mixed drug intoxication” but was not the sole cause of death.
The question in Rosemond v. United States is whether the federal offense of aiding and abetting the use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime requires proof of intentional facilitation or encouragement of the use of the firearm, or merely proof of simple knowledge that the principal used a firearm during a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime in which the defendant also participated.
To discuss these cases, we have John Malcolm, Director and Ed Gilbertson and Sherry Lindberg Gilbertson Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.
[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]
|Rosemond Oral Argument Transcripts - November 12, 2013 (PDF)|
|Burrage Oral Argument Transcripts - November 12, 2013 (PDF)|