Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission – Post-Re-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 09-10-09 featuring James Bopp, Jr.
September 10, 2009James Bopp Jr.
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission -
Post-Re-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:11:31
On September 9th, 2009, the Supreme Court heard re-argument in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The case concerns whether federal campaign finance laws apply to a film about then-Senator Hillary Clinton that was intended to be shown on-demand to cable subscribers and in theaters. After hearing argument last term, the Court ordered a re-argument to focus on the constitutionality of restricting the independent spending of corporations during campaigns for the Presidency and Congress.
To discuss the case and the re-argument, we have the General Counsel of the James Madison Center for Free Speech, James Bopp, Jr.
|Transcript of Oral Argument - March 24, 2009 (PDF)|
|Transcript of Oral Re-Argument - September 9, 2009 (PDF)|
|Oyez Project Audio Recording of Oral Re-Argument|
|C-Span Audio Recording of Oral Re-Arugment|