FedSoc on Facebook
FedSoc on YouTube
FedSoc on Twitter
FCC v. Fox - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 02-01-12 featuring Erik Jaffe and Patrick Brennan
February 1, 2012
Erik S. Jaffe, Patrick McKinley BrennanTo listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
FCC v. Fox - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:26:29
On January 10, 2012 the Supreme Court heard oral argument in FCC v. Fox. The question in this case is whether the Federal Communications Commission’s standards for indecency are too vague to be constitutional.
To discuss the case we have Erik Jaffe, a Washington, D.C. attorney who specializes in appellate litigation, and Patrick Brennan, who is Associate Dean of Academic Affairs and Professor at the Villanova University School of Law.
[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]
Related Links
| FCC v. Fox - Post-Decision SCOTUScast |
 |
| Oral Argument Transcript - January 10, 2012 (PDF) |
|
