The Federalist Society

Henderson v. United States - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast 8-14-13 featuring Elizabeth Papez

August 14, 2013

Elizabeth P. Papez

To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.

Salinas v. Texas - Post-Decision SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:17:35

Elizabeth P. PapezOn February 20, 2013, The Supreme Court announced its decision in Henderson v. United States. The question in the case is whether or not, when a criminal defendant’s sentence is plainly erroneous in light of an intervening Supreme Court decision, the “plain error” correction is prohibited under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b) because the law was unsettled when the district court imposed the sentence and the defendant failed to object.

In 6-3 decision delivered by Justice Breyer, the Court held that, regardless of whether a legal question was settled or unsettled at the time of trial, an error is “plain” within the meaning of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b) so long as the error was plain at the time of appellate review. The decision of the Fifth Circuit was reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings. Chief Justice Roberts as well as Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, Ginsburg and Kennedy joined the opinion of Court. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which Justices Thomas and Alito joined.

To discuss the case, we have Elizabeth Papez, a partner at Winston & Strawn, LLP.

[Return to the SCOTUScast menu] 

Related Links

Opinion - February 20, 2013 (PDF)
Oral Argument Transcript - November 28, 2012 (PDF)

The Federalist Society