Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. Rajoub - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 03-06-12 featuring Eugene Kontorovich
March 6, 2012Eugene Kontorovich
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. Rajoub - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:21:24
On February 28, 2012 the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. Rajoub. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum involves the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), which permits non-U.S. citizens to bring a lawsuit in federal court in order to seek relief for certain violations of international law. The question is whether corporations, and not merely individuals, can be held liable in an ATS lawsuit--and whether that issue affects the jurisdiction of the court even to hear the case. Mohamad v. Rajoub involves the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), and presents a similar question: whether corporations, and not merely natural persons, can be held liable for violations of the TVPA.
On March 5, 2012, however, the Supreme Court put the Kiobel case back on the calendar for re-argument, and directed the parties to brief whether and under what circumstances the ATS allows courts to address violations of the law of nations that occur outside the United States.
To discuss the cases, we have Eugene Kontorovich, who is a professor at the Northwestern University School of Law.
|Kiobel Oral Argument Transcript - February 28, 2012 (PDF)|
|Mohamad Oral Argument Transcript - February 28, 2012 (PDF)|
|Kiobel Order Transcript - March 5, 2012 (PDF)|