The Federalist Society

Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast 11-07-11 featuring Kent Scheidegger

November 7, 2011

Kent S. Scheidegger

To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.

audio Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:06:33

Kent S. ScheideggerOn October 31, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments for the cases Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye. The question in both cases revolves around what happens when a criminal defendant receives deficient legal advice.  

In Lafler v. Cooper, the Court considered whether a criminal defendant who rejects a favorable plea offer based on his lawyer’s advice but who later is convicted and receives a harsher sentence can seek to overturn that sentence on the grounds that his attorney was unconstitutionally deficient.  

Missouri v. Frye considered whether a criminal defendant whose lawyer failed to communicate a plea offer from the prosecution can make a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel against the lawyer, and what the courts should do for a defendant in this situation who is later convicted and sentenced.

To discuss the cases, we have Kent Scheidegger, who is the Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation.

[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]

Related Links

Oral Argument Transcript - Lafler v. Cooper - October 31, 2011 (PDF)
Oral Argument Transcript - Missouri v. Frye - October 31, 2011 (PDF)
Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

The Federalist Society