Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 12-30-13 featuring David Olson
December 30, 2013David S. Olson
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:24:36
On December 3, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. The question in this case is how to appropriately determine a party’s standing to bring a cause of action for false advertising under the Lanham Act. Are the correct factors (1) those set forth in Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters as adopted by the Third, Fifth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits; or (2) the categorical test, permitting suits only by an actual competitor, employed by the Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits; or finally, (3) a version of the more expansive “reasonable interest” test, either as applied by the Sixth Circuit in this case or as applied by the Second Circuit in prior cases?
To discuss the case, we have David Olson, who is an Associate Professor of Law at the Boston College Law School.
[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]
|Oral Argument Transcript -December 3, 2013 (PDF)|