FedSoc on Facebook
FedSoc on YouTube
FedSoc on Twitter
Martel v. Clair - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 12-14-11 featuring Ronald Eisenberg
December 14, 2011
Ronald EisenbergTo listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
Martel v. Clair - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:12:41
On December 6, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Martel v. Clair. The question in this case is whether a state prisoner on death row is entitled to replace his court-appointed attorney with a new court-appointed attorney on the grounds that--according to the prisoner--the first court-appointed attorney failed to pursue potentially important evidence relating to prisoner’s case.
To discuss the case, we have Ronald Eisenberg, who is the Deputy District Attorney for the Law Division at the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office.
[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]
Related Links
| Oral Argument Transcript - December 6, 2011 (PDF) |
 |
| Martel v. Clair - Post-Decision SCOTUScast |
|
