McDonald v. City of Chicago - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 07-02-2010 featuring Steven G. Calabresi
July 2, 2010Steven G. Calabresi
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
McDonald v. City of Chicago - Post-Decision SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:14:36
On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in McDonald v. City of Chicago. The question in this case was whether the Due Process Clause or the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment makes the right to keep and bear arms applicable to the States.
In an opinion delivered by Justice Alito, the Court held 5 to 4 that the Fourteenth Amendment makes the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense, which the Court recognized in District of Columbia v. Heller, applicable to the States. Four Justices based this ruling on the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. Justice Thomas agreed with the holding, but based his opinion on the Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause.
To discuss the case, we have Northwestern University School of Law Professor Steven G. Calabresi.
|Opinion - June 28, 2010 (PDF)|
|Oral Argument Transcript - March 2, 2010 (PDF)|
|McDonald v. City of Chicago - Post-Argument Debate SCOTUScast|
|McDonald v. City of Chicago - Cert Granted SCOTUScast Debate|