The Federalist Society

Miller v. Alabama - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast 07-13-12 featuring John Stinneford

July 13, 2012

John F. Stinneford

To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.

  Miller v. Alabama - Post-Decision SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:16:38

John F. StinnefordOn June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Miller v. Alabama (linked with Jackson v. Hobbs).  The question was whether a mandatory sentence of life in prison without possibility of parole, imposed for a murder committed when the defendant was fourteen years old constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment” in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

In an opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the Court held by a vote of 5-4 that the Eighth Amendment prohibits a sentencing scheme that mandates life in prison without possibility of parole for juvenile homicide offenders.  Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor joined the majority opinion.  Justice Breyer filed a concurring opinion, which was joined by Justice Sotomayor.  Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito.  Justice Thomas and Justice Alito each filed separate dissenting opinions, both of which were joined by Justice Scalia.

To discuss the case, we have John Stinneford, who is an assistant professor at the University of Florida Levin School of Law.

[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]

Related Links

Jackson v. Hobbs and Miller v. Alabama - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Opinion - June 25, 2012 (PDF)
Jackson v. Hobbs Oral Argument Transcript - March 20, 2012 (PDF)
Miller v. Alabama Oral Argument Transcript - March 20, 2012 (PDF)


The Federalist Society