NRG Power Marketing v. Maine Public Utilities Commission - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 08-06-10 featuring Ashley C. Parrish
August 6, 2010Ashley C. Parrish
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
On January 13, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in NRG Power Marketing v. Maine Public Utilities Commission. Under the Court's Mobile-Sierra doctrine, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) must presume that a wholesale-electricity rate set by "a freely negotiated wholesale-energy contract" meets the statutory "just and reasonable" requirement. The question in this case was whether the identity of a complainant affects the Mobile-Sierra presumption.
In an 8-1 opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held the Mobile-Sierra presumption does not depend upon the identify of the complainant seeking investigation. The Court reasoned that if FERC must presume a just and reasonable contract rate from fair, arms-length negotiations, noncontracting parties cannot escape that presumption. Furthermore the Mobile-Sierra doctrine does not neglect the interests of third-parties because it directs FERC, notwithstanding the presumption, to reject a contract rate that seriously harms the consuming public.
To discuss the case, we have Ashley C. Parrish, who is a partner at King & Spalding LLP.
|Opinion - January 13, 2010 (PDF)|
|Oral Argument Transcript - November 3, 2009 (PDF)|