Originalism: A Rationalization for Conservatism or a Principled Theory of Interpretation? - Event Audio/Video
University of Pennsylvania Student Chapter
February 26, 2010Ryan Ulloa, Michael A. Fitts, Mary Anne Case, Richard Fallon, Saikrishna B. Prakash, Keith Whittington, Gregory G. Garre
2010 Annual Student Symposium
The following audio was recorded on February 26, 2010.
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2010
Welcome and Introduction
- Mr. Ryan Ulloa, Symposium Director, University of Pennsylvania Law School
- Dean Michael A. Fitts, University of Pennsylvania Law School
Originalism: A Rationalization for Conservatism or a Principled Theory of Interpretation?
One of the criticisms of originalism is that it simply is code for conservative ideology. Pointing to figures such as Justice Scalia, some characterize originalism merely as a tool of the Republican Party, suggesting that all originalist jurisprudence is also politically conservative. The first question for originalism is what justifies originalism as a theory of constitutional interpretation as opposed to a political program. Originalists have advanced a variety of justifications for originalism. Some justify it on the basis that originalism is implicit in the use of language. Others suggest that originalism is to be preferred, because it is the theory that delivers the clearest rules. This panel will explore such justifications as well as critiques of originalism.
- Prof. Mary Anne Case, University of Chicago Law School
- Prof. Richard Fallon, Harvard Law School
- Prof. Saikrishna Prakash, University of Virginia School of Law
- Prof. Keith Whittington, Princeton University
- Moderator: Hon. Greg Garre, 44th Solicitor General of the United States
University of Pennsylvania Law School