Perry v. New Hampshire - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 01-31-12 featuring Jessie Liu
January 31, 2012Jessie Liu
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
Perry v. New Hampshire - Post-Decision SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:11:16
On January 11, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Perry v. New Hampshire. The question here was whether, in a criminal case, the Due Process Clause of the Constitution requires a court to evaluate the reliability of an eyewitness identification of the defendant when the circumstances under which the identification occurred were suggestive, regardless of how those circumstances came about. The lower court rejected the defendant’s argument in favor of such a rule, concluding that a court is required to assess the reliability of identification evidence only when law enforcement employs suggestive identification techniques.
In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the lower court by a vote of 8-1. Where there is no improper law enforcement activity involved, the Court held, it suffices to test reliability through the normal rights and opportunities afforded for that purpose, such as the presence of counsel at post-indictment lineups and vigorous cross-examination. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, and Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion.
To discuss the case, we have Jessie Liu, who is a partner at Jenner & Block, LLP.
|Opinion - January 11, 2012 (PDF)|
|Oral Argument Transcript - November 2, 2011 (PDF)|
|Perry v. New Hampshire - Post-Argument SCOTUScast|