Perry v. Perez - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 02-03-12 featuring Ilya Shapiro
February 3, 2012Ilya Shapiro
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
Perry v. Perez- Post-Decision SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:11:36
On January 20, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Perry v. Perez. This case involved efforts to redraw Texas’ electoral districts due to an increase of four million residents identified by the 2010 Census. Texas proposed a new electoral plan, but as a “covered jurisdiction” was required by the Voting Rights Act to obtain preclearance from a special court in Washington, D.C. before the plan could take effect. While Texas’ petition for preclearance was pending, several groups challenged the proposed plan in federal court in Texas, which then drafted an interim electoral plan for use in upcoming 2012 elections. The question before the Supreme Court was whether this interim plan improperly disregarded details of the plan proposed by Texas.
In a per curiam opinion, the Court unanimously held that it was unclear whether the federal court in Texas had followed appropriate standards in drafting its interim plan. The Court therefore vacated the interim plan and remanded the case for further proceedings. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
To discuss the case, we have Ilya Shapiro, who is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute.
|Opinion - January 20, 2012 (PDF)|
|Oral Argument Transcript - January 9, 2012 (PDF)|