Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission – Post-Decision Debate SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast 01-22-10 featuring Edward B. Foley, Erik S. Jaffe, & Bradley A. Smith

January 22, 2010

Edward B. Foley, Erik S. Jaffe, Bradley A. Smith

To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.

  Citizens United v. FEC - Post-Decision Debate SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:44:04

On January 21, 2009, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Citizens United v. FEC.  The Court struck down as inconsistent with the First Amendment a provision of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act regarding independent expenditures by corporations that the FEC had said would forbid the airing of advertisements about a documentary about Hillary Clinton that Citizens United sought to air during the 2008 primary season.

To discuss this case, we have the Director of the Election Law Program at the Ohio State University Moritz College, Professor Edward B. Foley, and the Josiah H. Blackmore II & Shirley M. Nault Professor of Law at Capital University Law School, Professor Bradley A. Smith. To moderate the discussion, we have Supreme Court advocate and Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Executive Committee member Erik S. Jaffe.

[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]

Related Links

Transcript of Oral Reargument - September 9, 2009 (PDF)
Opinion - January 21, 2009 (PDF)
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission – Post-Re-Argument SCOTUScast
Citizens United v. FEC
Citizens United v. FEC: Do Corporations Have Rights to Political Speech?
Congress Shall Make No Law (Except Campaign Finance Laws)?: Citizens United & the First Amendment