Does the Originalism of the Fourteenth Amendment Guarantee Justice for All? - Event Audio/Video

University of Pennsylvania Student Chapter

February 27, 2010

Akhil Reed Amar, Jack M. Balkin, Steven G. Calabresi, John C. Harrison, Amy Wax

2010 Annual Student Symposium 

The following audio was recorded on February 27, 2010.

 

Does the Originalism of the Fourteenth Amendment
Guarantee Justice for All? 2-27-10
Running Time: 01:28:44
[audio Full Audio]
[video Videos 1-11 on YouTube]

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2010
3:45 p.m.
Panel IV

Does the Originalism of the Fourteenth Amendment Guarantee Justice for All?

Often, critics argue that originalism will trap us in the sins of societies past, doomed to repeat some of history’s mistakes.  If originalism cannot adequately meet these challenges, some would argue that it is significantly lacking as an interpretive theory.   The Fourteenth Amendment  is the provision of the Constitution often used to correct these injustices. This panel will examine the importance of the Fourteenth Amendment for the theory of originalism.  For instance, does it transform the meaning of previous amendments? Are there distinctive interpretive rules for the Fourteenth Amendment?   Can Fourteenth Amendment be interpreted in an originalist manner  to provide equal justice for all?

  • Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, Yale Law School 
  • Prof. Jack Balkin, Yale Law School 
  • Prof. Steven Calabresi, Northwestern University School of Law
  • Prof. John Harrison, University of Virginia School of Law
  • Moderator: Prof. Amy Wax, University of Pennsylvania Law School

University of Pennsylvania Law School
Philadelphia, PA

[Return to the main event page]