FCC v. Fox - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 07-03-12 featuring Erik Jaffe and Patrick Brennan
July 3, 2012Erik S. Jaffe, Patrick McKinley Brennan
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
FCC v. Fox - Jaffe - Post-Decision SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:14:18
FCC v. Fox - Brennan - Post-Decision SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:13:58
On June 21, 2012 the Supreme Court announced its decision in FCC v. Fox. The question in this case was whether the standards for indecency that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) applied to broadcasts by Fox and ABC were unconstitutionally vague.
In an opinion delivered by Justice Kennedy, the Court ruled by a vote of 8-0 that, because the FCC failed to give Fox and ABC prior notice that fleeting expletives and momentary nudity were unacceptable, the FCC’s standards for indecency were too vague. Justice Ginsburg filed a concurring opinion. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
We have Erik Jaffe, a Washington, D.C. attorney who specializes in appellate litigation, and Patrick Brennan, Associate Dean of Academic Affairs and Professor at the Villanova University School of Law, to discuss the case in two separate podcasts.
[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]
|FCC v. Fox - Post-Argument SCOTUScast|
|Opinion - June 21, 2012 (PDF)|
|Oral Argument Transcript - January 10, 2012 (PDF)|