Jackson v. Hobbs and Miller v. Alabama - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast 03-28-12 featuring John Stinneford

March 28, 2012

John F. Stinneford

To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.

audio Jackson v. Hobbs and Miller v. Alabama - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:12:30 

John F. StinnefordOn March 20, 2012 the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Jackson v. Hobbs and Miller v. Alabama. The question in both cases is whether a sentence of life in prison without possibility of parole, imposed for a murder committed when the defendant was fourteen years old, constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment” in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

To discuss the cases, we have John Stinneford, who is an assistant professor at the University of Florida Levine School of Law.

[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]

Related Links

Miller v. Alabama - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
Jackson v. Hobbs Oral Argument Transcript - March 20, 2012 (PDF)
Miller v. Alabama Oral Argument Transcript - March 20, 2012 (PDF)