L.A. County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast 1-9-13 featuring Damien Schiff

January 9, 2013

Damien Schiff

To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.

L.A. County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:09:39

Damien SchiffOn January 8, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council.  The question in the case was whether, when someone channels water from an improved part of a river to an unimproved part of the same river (to control flooding), certain limitations prescribed by the Clean Water Act apply.

In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held unanimously that such water flow does not constitute a “discharge of pollutants” under the Clean Water Act.  Justice Alito concurred in the judgment.    

To discuss the case, we have Damien Schiff, a Principal Attorney for Pacific Legal Foundation.

[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]

Related Links

Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Opinion - January 8, 2013 (PDF)
Oral Argument Transcript - December 4, 2012 (PDF)