McQuiggin v. Perkins and Trevino v. Thaler - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 3-27-13 featuring Ward Campbell
March 27, 2013Ward Campbell
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
McQuiggin v. Perkins and Trevino v. Thaler - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:25:26
The question in McQuiggin is whether, under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, there is an actual-innocence exception to the requirement that a petitioner show an extraordinary circumstance that “prevented timely filing” of a habeas petition, and if so, whether there is an additional actual-innocence exception to the requirement that a petitioner demonstrate that “he has been pursuing his rights diligently.”
The question in Trevino involves the Court’s 2012 decision Martinez v. Ryan, which holds that ineffective assistance of counsel in state post-conviction proceedings--with regard to claims that could not be raised on direct appeal--excuses the defendant’s failure to raise such claims in the state post-conviction proceedings, and therefore allows him to raise them for the first time in a subsequent federal habeas proceeding. The question in Trevino is whether Martinez applies when it is unclear under state law whether the claims in question could have been raised on direct appeal.
To discuss the cases, we have Ward Campbell, who is the Supervising Deputy Attorney General at the California Department of Justice.
[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]
|Trevino v. Thaler - Oral Argument Transcript - February 25, 2013 (PDF)|
|Martinez v. Ryan - Post-Decision SCOTUScast|
|McQuiggen v. Perkins - Oral Argument Transcript - February 25, 2013 (PDF)|