Rent Control and the Supreme Court: Harmon v. Markus - Podcast
Environmental Law & Property Rights Practice Group Podcast
February 16, 2012Richard A. Epstein, Dean A. Reuter
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
Rent Control and the Supreme Court: Harmon v. Markus - MP3
Running Time: 00:43:26
In March 2011, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued summary judgment in Harmon v. Markus, a challenge to New York's rent stabilization law by Mr. John Harmon, whose townhouse has been occupied for years by tenants paying rent equal to about 60% of market value. The Second Circuit ruled that "government regulation of the rental relationship does not constitute a physical taking" in light of the Supreme Court precedent, and that Mr. Harmon was therefore not entitled to just compensation. The Supreme Court has asked New York City and the tenants to file a response to the certiorari petition filed by Mr. Harmon. On this previously recorded conference call, Prof. Richard Epstein provides analysis of the case and rent control statutes as they relate to the Takings Clause and answers questions from the callers.
- Prof. Richard Epstein, New York University School of Law
- Moderator: Mr. Dean A. Reuter, Vice President & Director of Practice Groups, The Federalist Society
|"Supreme Court should take on New York City’s rent control laws" by George Will, Washington Post|
|"Rent Control Hits the Supreme Court" by Richard Epstein, Wall Street Journal|