SCOTUScast 7-5-09 featuring Brian Brooks
Vaden v. Discover Bank
July 5, 2009Brian P. Brooks
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
SCOTUScast 7-5-09 featuring Brian Brooks - MP3
Running Time: 00:11:29
On Monday, March 9, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Vaden v. Discover Bank. In this case, the Supreme Court considered whether a suit brought under the Federal Arbitration Act “aris[es] under” federal law when the petition to compel raises no federal question, but the underlying dispute does involve federal law. In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held that, following the well-pleaded complaint rule, federal jurisdiction for the purposes of compelling arbitration cannot rest upon the contents of a counterclaim, reversing the Fourth Circuit decision below. O’Melveny and Myers partner Brian Brooks discusses the decision.
Oral Argument - October 6, 2008:
Decision - March 9, 2009:
|--SCOTUScast 10-17-08 featuring Amy Barrett|