United States v. Comstock - Post-Argument Debate SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast 05-03-10 featuring Stephen R. McAllister, Ilya Shapiro, & Erin Sheley

May 3, 2010

Stephen R. McAllister, Ilya Shapiro, Erin Sheley

To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.

  United States v. Comstock - MP3
Running Time: 00:32:01

On January 12, 2010, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. Comstock. The question in this case is whether Congress had the constitutional authority enact 18 U.S.C. 4248, which authorizes court-ordered civil commitment by the federal government of (1) "sexually dangerous" persons who are already in the custody of the Bureau  of Prisons, but who are coming to the end of their federal prison sentences, and (2) "sexually dangerous" persons who are in the custody of the Attorney General because they have been found mentally incompetent to stand trial.

To discuss the case, we have University of Kansas School of Law Professor Stephen R. McAllister and Mr. Ilya Shapiro, who is a Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies at the Cato Institute and the Editor-in-Chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review. Ms. Erin Sheley, the Deputy Director of the Federalist Society's Faculty Division, is the discussion's moderator.

[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]

Related Links

Oral Argument Transcript – January 12, 2010 (PDF)
United States v. Comstock - Post-Decision Debate SCOTUScast