White v. Woodall - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 1-13-14 featuring Robert Blecker
January 13, 2014Robert Blecker
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.
White v. Woodall - Post-Argument SCOTUScast - MP3
Running Time: 00:11:04
On December 11, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in White v. Woodall. The case presents two questions: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit violated the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act by granting habeas relief because a Kentucky trial court refused to issue an instruction to the jury telling it not to draw adverse inferences from the defendant's silence at the sentencing phase in a death penalty case, even though no Supreme Court precedent establishes that such an instruction must be given at the penalty phase when a non-testifying defendant has pled guilty to the crimes and aggravating circumstances; and (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated the harmless error standard in Brecht v. Abrahamson in ruling that the absence of a no adverse inference instruction was not harmless in spite of overwhelming evidence of guilt and in the face of a guilty pleas to the crimes and aggravators.
To discuss the case, we have Robert Blecker who is a Professor of Law at the New York Law School.
[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]
|Oral Argument Transcript - December 11, 2013 (PDF)|