Labor & Employment Law
Executive Committee Contact Information
Subcommittees
- Discrimination & Disability Law
- Pro Bono Outreach
- State Employment Law
- Union Activity & Individual Employee Rights
Upcoming Events
|
2009 National Lawyers Convention |
Recent Publications
|
The Employee Free Choice Act and the South |
|
The Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA)1 is among the top items on President Obama’s legislative agenda; it was a clear campaign promise to a core constituency—organized labor. Most Southern business and political leaders strongly oppose EFCA’s practical elimination of secret ballot union representation elections, as well as its imposition of labor contracts through government-controlled interest arbitration. They see EFCA as a rustbelt eff ort to impose a failed business model on sunbelt employers. Because EFCA is perceived to threaten decades of social and economic development progress, aggrieved state legislatures may well retaliate by passing laws that purport to regulate union organizing, strikes, and related activities already regulated by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Opponents of such state laws may argue, based on decades of judicial decisions, that the NLRA pre-empts state regulation of labor relations. Southern business and political leaders are already preparing to fi ght this battle.... |
|
|
Kyoto II as Congressional-Executive Agreement: The Emerging Strategy? |
|
The new Obama administration generated great expectations, not least among those seeking to craft a successor treaty to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on “global warming.” Yet early signals that an Obama administration had no plans to join Europe in agreeing to a successor pact next December, as expected, indicated that this issue would instead prove a stunning disappointment to its champions. Now, however, it appears that Kyoto will be the subject of a controversial effort to sharply revise U.S. environmental treaty practice.... |
|
|
Boston Harbor’s Unresolved Presumption |
|
A project labor agreement (“PLA”) is a union collective bargaining agreement that all contractors must sign to work on a construction project. In Boston Harbor, the Supreme Court held that a government entity acting as an owner-developer of a public construction project could lawfully require compliance with a union-only PLA, without running afoul of federal preemption, on the presumption that a private owner-developer could lawfully take the same action. As a result of this 1993 decision, the use of PLAs on public construction projects has dramatically increased.... |
|
|
Engage Volume 10, Issue 1, February 2009 |
|
|
|

