The Federalist Society

SCOTUScast 11-2-07 featuring Stephen McAllister

Danforth v. Minnesota

November 2, 2007

Stephen R. McAllister

To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then select "Save Link As..." or "Save Target As..." After you save the audio file to your computer, you can then listen to it in your audio player of choice.

 SCOTUScast 11-2-07 featuring Stephen McAllister - MP3
Running Time: 00:10:01

Bio for Stephen McAllister

On October 31st, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Danforth v. Minnesota.  The Court was asked to consider whether state supreme courts are required to use the standard announced in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), to determine whether United States Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases, or may a state court apply state-law- or state-constitution-based retroactivity tests that afford application of Supreme Court decisions to a broader class of criminal defendants than the class defined by Teague.  In this episode of SCOTUScast, Professor Stephen McAllister of Kansas University Law School discusses the case.

 

Click HERE for a later SCOTUScast featuring Stephen McAllister's thoughts on the decision in Danforth v. Minnesota.

[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]


The Federalist Society