Law Firm Pro Bono Challenge Statement of Principles

Recognizing the growing severity of the unmet legal needs of the poor and disadvantaged in the communities we serve, and mindful that major law firms must--in the finest traditions of our profession--play a leading role in addressing these unmet needs, our firm is pleased to join with other firms across the country in subscribing to the following statement of principles and in pledging our best efforts to achieve the voluntary goals described below.

1. Our firm recognizes its institutional obligation to encourage and support the participation by all of its attorneys in pro bono publico activities. We agree to promulgate and maintain a clearly articulated and commonly understood firm policy which unequivocally states the firm’s commitment to pro bono work.
2. To underscore our institutional commitment to pro bono activities, we agree to use our best efforts to ensure that, by no later than the close of calendar year 1995, our firm will either:
   • annually contribute, at a minimum, an amount of time equal to 5 percent of the firm's total billable hours to pro bono work; or
   • annually contribute, at a minimum, an amount of time equal to 3 percent of the firm's total billable hours to pro bono work.

 

3. In recognition of the special needs of the poor for legal services, we believe that our firm’s pro bono activities should be particularly focused on providing access to the justice system for persons otherwise unable to afford it. Accordingly, in meeting the voluntary goals described above, we agree that a majority of the minimum pro bono time contributed by our firm should consist of the delivery of legal services on a pro bono basis to persons of limited means or to charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental and educational organizations in matters which are designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited means.
4. Recognizing that broad-based participation in pro bono activities is desirable, our firm agrees that, in meeting the minimum goals described above, we will use our best efforts to ensure that a majority of both partners and associates in the firm participate annually in pro bono activities.
   
5. In furtherance of these principles, our firm also agrees:

(a) To provide a broad range of pro bono opportunities, training, and supervision to attorneys in the firm, to ensure that all of our attorneys can avail themselves of the opportunity to do pro bono work;

(b) To ensure that the firm’s policies with respect to evaluation, advancement, productivity, and compensation of its attorneys are compatible with the firm’s strong commitment to encourage and support substantial pro bono participation by all attorneys; and

(c) To monitor the firm’s progress toward the goals established in this statement and to report its progress annually to the members of the firm and to the American Bar Association’s Law Firm Pro Bono Project. 6. This firm also recognizes the obligation of major law firms to contribute financial support to organizations that provide legal services free of charge to persons of limited means.

7. As used in this statement, the term pro bono refers to activities of the firm undertaken normally without expectation of fee and not in the course of ordinary commercial practice and consisting of

(a) the delivery of legal services to persons of limited means or to charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental and educational organizations in matters which are designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited means;

(b) the provision of legal assistance to individuals, groups, or organizations seeking to secure or protect civil rights, civil liberties or public rights; and

(c) the provision of legal assistance to charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental or educational organizations in matters in furtherance of their organizational purposes, where the payment of standard legal fees would significantly deplete the organization’s economic resources or would be otherwise inappropriate.

 

Law Firm Pro Bono Challenge

Commentary to Statement of Principles

Principle 1

Our firm recognizes its institutional obligation to encourage and support the participation by all of its attorneys in pro bono publico activities. We agree to promulgate and maintain a clearly articulated and commonly understood firm policy which unequivocally states the firm’s commitment to pro bono work.

Commentary: An Institutional Commitment

 

We ask that each law firm recognize and structure an active institutional commitment to pro bono public service, rather than simply accommodating the interest and commitment of its individual attorneys. The goal of such institutional support is to ensure that the special resources and expertise of the firm are collectively focused on the management and implementation of an effective and productive pro bono effort and on the reduction or elimination of barriers to pro bono work. It is also designed to develop and nurture a firm culture in which pro bono service is a routine and valued part of each individual’s professional life. The leadership of the firm should convey, in clear, unambiguous terms, the firm’s commitment as an institution as well as its expectation that each individual will strive to help fulfill the firm-wide commitment. Many firms have found that a comprehensive written pro bono policy is an excellent vehicle for communicating that commitment. The firm should then implement its policy through a structured program that fosters pro bono work.

 

Principle 2

To underscore our institutional commitment to pro bono activities, we agree to use our best efforts to ensure that, by no later than the close of calendar year 1995, our firm will either:

Commentary: Quantifying the Commitment

 

We believe that the establishment of a concrete, quantifiable, firm-wide aspirational goal will assist firms in communicating support for pro bono and in assessing the overall effectiveness of their pro bono programs. The expression of that goal as a percentage of total billable hours, rather than as a goal of hours per individual attorney, underscores the institutional nature of the commitment. While we believe that it is both feasible and appropriate for major law firms to contribute 5% of their billable hours to pro bono activities, we recognize that substantial differences exist among firms with respect to their current levels of pro bono activity. Accordingly, we have provided firms with a choice between two alternative aspirational goals: a goal of 5 percent of total billable hours or a goal of 3 percent of total billable hours.

 

Many firms already report contributions of pro bono time far in excess of either of these goals. Indeed, several major firms presently expend 8% or more of their time on pro bono activities. For other firms, accepting the challenge to aspire to even the lower of the two goals represents a dramatic expansion of their current level of effort. These levels are consonant with existing aspirational bar resolutions which call for annual goals of up to 80 hours per attorney. For example, we anticipate that the 3% aspirational goal will translate into a per-attorney goal somewhat in excess of 50 hours annually, a commitment that is consistent with the aspirational goals established by the American Bar Association and many state and local bar associations.

 

Many major law firms have established branch offices in foreign countries. Recognizing that pro bono service may not be feasible for attorneys in these offices, the 5%/3% goals should be applied only to the total billable hours performed by firm attorneys working in the United States.

 

Principle 3

In recognition of the special needs of the poor for legal services, we believe that our firm’s pro bono activities should be particularly focused on providing access to the justice system for persons otherwise unable to afford it. Accordingly, in meeting the voluntary goals described above, we agree that a majority of the minimum pro bono time contributed by our firm should consist of the delivery of legal services on a pro bono basis to persons of limited means or to charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental and educational organizations in matters which are designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited means.

Commentary: Pro Bono--Meeting the Need

 

While we recognize and applaud the rich diversity of pro bono activities undertaken by law firms, with respect to the minimum aspirational goal established by the Challenge, we strongly support a special emphasis by firms on the legal problems of persons of limited means. Studies routinely report that more than 80% of the civil legal needs of the poor are not presently being met. The resources and expertise of leading law firms should be brought to bear to assist the most vulnerable of our citizens in securing their rights.

 

Legal services, as used in this Commentary, consists of a broad range of activities, including, among others, individual and class representation, legislative lobbying and administrative rulemaking, as well as legal assistance to organizations seeking to develop low-income housing, improve community services, or increase the financial resources of persons of limited means. Many activities traditionally viewed by firms as falling in other pro bono categories such as civil rights or civil liberties cases, environmental claims, community economic development, and consumer protection matters can, in fact, often also be accurately described as falling within the priority for legal services to persons of limited means.

 

Emphasis on the legal needs of persons of limited means is not intended to supplant the involvement of firms in complex pro bono matters for other populations. Many major law firms have a strong commitment to public interest litigation and projects, including high impact class action suits and policy advocacy, that promote essential public policies and ensure that our society functions equitably. Firms undertaking these complex and time-consuming matters often commit resources far in excess of the Challenge’s minimum goals.

 

Principle 4

Recognizing that broad-based participation in pro bono activities is desirable, our firm agrees that, in meeting the minimum goals described above, we will use our best efforts to ensure that a majority of both partners and associates in the firm participate annually in pro bono activities.

Commentary: Broad-based Participation in Pro Bono

 

While we urge the firm’s institutional support for pro bono, that support will be enhanced if pro bono publico service is the concern of all lawyers in the firm rather than only a few highly committed individuals. Experience has demonstrated that broad-based participation at all levels, including the most senior members of the firm, is a key element in developing and nurturing a successful firm pro bono program. Myriad opportunities for service exist -- opportunities that will interest and challenge senior partners as well as young associates, business and tax lawyers as well as litigators. Broad-based participation in pro bono service promotes firm-wide support for that activity and serves as a concrete and visible affirmation of the firm’s institutional commitment. Finally, by involving lawyers with a broad range of interests and skills, the firm can enrich its service to the community.

 

Principle 5

In furtherance of these principles, our firm also agrees:

 

Commentary: Promoting and Recognizing Pro Bono Service

(a)	We encourage firms actively to seek out a broad range of pro bono opportunities for their lawyers and to provide or secure the necessary support, training, and supervision so that lawyers will be encouraged to take on these cases or projects. Pro bono matters should be administered in the same manner as commercial work. All of the firm’s resources and support services should be available to the pro bono attorney, and the matter should be subject to the firm’s oversight and quality control procedures. It is especially important that all pro bono matters be supervised in a manner consistent with the firm’s overall supervision requirements. One obstacle that often limits participation in pro bono work is the concern that a firm lacks sufficient substantive expertise in particular areas of law. Many firms have taken steps to ensure that the necessary substantive supervision is available by identifying experts within or outside of the firm or by providing or securing training for firm attorneys. A number of firms have established a pro bono committee, identified an individual to serve as the firm’s pro bono coordinator, or otherwise formally assigned someone in the firm the responsibility for ensuring that the firm offers interesting pro bono opportunities and supports its lawyers in undertaking pro bono work. A formalized structure for identifying, screening, and monitoring pro bono work strengthens the visibility and effectiveness of the firm’s overall pro bono effort.
(b)	In an era of increased expectations with respect to billable hours, receipts, or similar measures, a firm commitment to pro bono must include positive incentives to perform that work. Whether this takes the form of billable hours credit, receivables equivalent credit, or some other form of recognition for time spent on pro bono work will depend on the firm’s existing incentives system. It is equally important that participation in pro bono work be identified as one criterion for positive evaluations and advancement in the firm. Many firms have developed systems to ensure that such evaluations explicitly include assessment of pro bono work. Firms have also established supplemental efforts to promote recognition of pro bono work, such as firm-wide pro bono awards and bonus programs.
(c)	As part of its institutional commitment, the firm should monitor its progress in meeting its aspirational minimum goal, as well as its level of involvement in legal services to persons of limited means, and should disseminate information on the status of the pro bono program broadly within the firm. To assist the American Bar Association in assessing the impact of the Law Firm Challenge on the availability of pro bono firm resources, the firm will also provide information to the Association. That information will be confidential and will not be released in any form which identifies a specific firm.

 

Principle 6

This firm also recognizes the obligation of major law firms to contribute financial support to organizations that provide legal services free of charge to persons of limited means.

Commentary: Financial Support

The level of firm pro bono commitment identified in the Law Firm Challenge is not intended to replace or diminish a firm’s monetary contributions to organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means. The Challenge commitment is one of actual service and personal involvement in pro bono work. We strongly encourage law firms to continue and expand their financial support of legal services organizations. These organizations need both service and monetary contributions from major law firms.

 

Principle 7

As used in this statement, the term pro bono refers to activities of the firm undertaken normally without expectation of fee and not in the course of ordinary commercial practice and consisting of

 

Commentary: Definition of Pro Bono

 

The definition of pro bono contained in the Challenge, although somewhat revised, tracks existing policy definitions adopted by the American Bar Association, state and local bar associations, and many law firms. The definition ensures that the firm and its attorneys can utilize varied legal skills to undertake a broad range of activities in meeting their pro bono responsibility.

 

Activities under clause (a) of the definition clearly fall within the recommended priority for legal services to persons of limited means, as do some of the activities under clause (b). In the vast majority of all matters, the firm’s pro bono participation will be undertaken without a fee or any expectation of a fee. However, there are very limited instances in which the acceptance of a fee award will not disqualify a matter from inclusion in the definition of pro bono. Post-conviction capital appeals, for example, where firms contribute thousands of hours without compensation but may receive the limited fees available to counsel under the Criminal Justice Act, are clearly pro bono cases for persons of limited means.

 

Similarly, the award of attorneys’ fees in an employment discrimination or environmental protection case originally taken on by a firm as a pro bono matter and not in the course of the firm’s ordinary commercial practice would not disqualify such services from inclusion as pro bono work. Firms that receive fees in such cases are encouraged to contribute an appropriate portion of those fees to organizations or projects that provide services to persons of limited means.