MENU

Judiciary

News

computer lock privacy

Old Law, New Technology, and the Congressional Need To Update ECPA

Viet Dinh June 08, 2017
SHARE:      

Last week, witnesses before the Senate Judiciary Committee faced much more amicable questions than then-Judge Gorsuch. In a rare moment of bipartisan consensus, Senators on both sides of the aisle agreed to pass legislation by year end. The subject: law enforcement’s ability to collect email evidence under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”). While electronic communications have changed rapidly, the law protecting consumers’ private data has stood still. ECPA was written when Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg was two years old. Back then, emails were an up-and-coming technology with no international implications, and storing an email was a costly affair. As the hearing last week underscored, it is time for Congress to take ECPA out of storage and fix it. [Read More]

News

Article: Supreme Court Season of Turmoil

Author Response: More on Judicial Impartiality

David L. Applegate July 25, 2016
SHARE:      

I concur wholeheartedly with Evan Bernick’s thesis, written in response to my recent blog, “Trump Trumps Ginsburg,” July 18, 2016, that “systematic judicial bias that poses a far graver threat to constitutionally limited government than an individual justice’s opinion of a presidential candidate.” (See Bernick, “Judicial Impartiality Must Not Be a Mere ‘Façade’: On the Dangers of Individual and Systematic Judicial Bias,” July 19, 2016.) He is surely correct that “[i]mpartiality is not only an individual duty but a systemic ideal to which the judiciary is institutionally committed by explicit constitutional commands” (emphasis in original). [Read More]

News

A Baker's Dozen Reasons to Oppose Sentencing "Reform" - By William G. Otis

How will President Obama's judicial appointees affect the federal courts?

Damien Schiff May 06, 2016
SHARE:      

Earlier this week, the Federalist Society hosted a teleforum conference call to discuss that subject. Brett Shumate of Wiley Rein addressed the impact of the president's appointments on the D.C. Circuit, and I addressed the same question as applied to the Ninth Circuit, with particular reference to the latter court's environmental law jurisprudence.

The president has appointed seven new judges to the Ninth Circuit. Interestingly, three of them come from the same California appellate law firm, Munger Tolles & Olson. The remainder have the typical background of DOJ and lower court experience.  Although all of the appointments could fairly be described as liberal in their basic outlook, they appear to lack much of the "green" taint of prior Democratic appointees to the Ninth Circuit. Instead, the new appointees appear to prefer to defer consistently to federal agency decision-making, even as against environmentalist challenges to an arguably "anti-green" result. [Read More]

Executive Branch Review

The Separation of Powers, "Stare Decisis," and the Constitution by Roger Pilon

The Separation of Powers, "Stare Decisis," and the Constitution

Roger Pilon September 09, 2015
SHARE:      

Because the U.S. Constitution is dedicated to liberty through limited government, power is divided between the federal and state governments and separated among the three branches of the federal government—the purpose in both cases being to pit power against power in order to check it. Stare decisis, the principle that courts should follow previous rulings when deciding similar cases, plays a limited but important role in that undertaking: it gives notice to actors in the political branches and the states about what the law is and what it will likely be in the future, thus securing the rule of law. Furthermore, it enables private parties also to adjust their behavior and plan ahead; especially in economic and business affairs, where long-term investments are common, legal stability and predictability are crucial. ... [Read More]