BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 11.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:20120627T140000
DTEND;TZID=US-Eastern:20120627T150000
LOCATION:Conference Call
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SEQUENCE:0
UID:00000B78D03F3D74BD04B8A7BC89BFA12680C@eresources.id
DTSTAMP:20130518T225900
DESCRIPTION;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Description:=0D=0AAs the U.S. Supreme Court term comes to a close, there has been a great deal of discussion about “judicial activism.” Some commentators have asserted that if the Court overturns the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, it will be an instance of judicial activism. Other commentators assert that doing so will be nothing more than a demonstration of fidelity to the Constitution as the Court performs its legitimate, recognized role of judicial review. Does the definition of “judicial activism” depend upon one’s perspective? Can “judicial activism” be reconciled with the Court’s recognized role of judicial review? Is there a more apt term? Featuring: =0D=0ADr. John C. Eastman, Chapman University School of Law =0D=0AProf. Ilya Somin, George Mason University School of Law =0D=0A=0D=0AAgenda: =0D=0ACall begins at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. =0D=0A=0D=0ARegistration Details: =0D=0ATeleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138. =0D=0A=0D=0A
SUMMARY:Judicial Activism
PRIORITY:5
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
CLASS:PUBLIC
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR