BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 11.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=US-Eastern:20121126T130000
DTEND;TZID=US-Eastern:20121126T140000
LOCATION:Conference Call
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SEQUENCE:0
UID:00000B78D03F3D74BD04B8A7BC89BFA12680C@eresources.id
DTSTAMP:20130521T000900
DESCRIPTION;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Description:=0D=0AWe tend to think of administrative law in terms of "one issue, one agency." But often Congress delegates to several agencies responsibility over a single subject. It might do so intentionally, but sometimes this occurs unintentionally, when a new statutory program collides with an old one. And so, for example, we currently are witnessing two independent agencies -- the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission -- litigating against one another in federal court, on the question of which agency has jurisdiction to enforce market-manipulation laws. These cases raise difficult issues of presidential power, congressional responsibility, and judicial review. What are the consequences of this dynamic? What does it mean for the unitary executive? Featuring: =0D=0AMr. Steven G. Bradbury, Partner, Dechert LLP =0D=0AMr. Adam White, Counsel, Boyden Gray & Associates =0D=0A=0D=0AAgenda: =0D=0ACall begins at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. =0D=0A=0D=0ARegistration Details: =0D=0ATeleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138. =0D=0A=0D=0A
SUMMARY:"Agency vs. Agency," and Other Problems of Overlapping Jurisdiction
PRIORITY:5
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
CLASS:PUBLIC
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR